Once again, a government body is
deciding whether its local zoo or aquarium should be permitted to keep a
species of animal. Last year, it was the Toronto City Council weighing in on
the issue of elephants at the Toronto Zoo. The Council, made up of people with
no particular expertise in the matter, voted to get out of the elephant
business and send the Zoo’s three African elephants to a sanctuary in
California.
More recently, two members of the
U.S. House from California have proposed a federal study on the impact of
captivity on large marine animals, while the California State Assembly was
unable to decide on proposed a bill to end killer-whale shows and discontinue
orca captivity in the State.
Now, the Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation is holding public
hearings on the pros and cons of having captive cetaceans (whales) at the
Vancouver Aquarium. The aquarium not only wants to continue keeping whales and
dolphins, it also plans to invest $100 million dollars in facility upgrades. According
to media reports, more than a hundred people have signed up to speak in what
will no doubt be a series of emotionally charged public forums. No less an
authority than Jane Goodall has already sent a letter to the Park Board in
opposition to the Aquarium’s position. It is hard to argue with the opposition.
Whales in the wild roam hundreds of square miles of open ocean. How can we
possibly justify keeping them in swimming pools the size of an average suburban
yard?
But, if we pass laws prohibiting
the keeping of whales, what will happen to those animals that are rescued and
cannot survive in the wild? Are we really saying they are better off dead as
some zoo & aquarium critics say? And who will be making those decisions,
zoo and aquarium professionals, animal rights activists who oppose zoos and
aquariums altogether, or politicians who have no expertise whatsoever? Who are
the real winners and losers in these public, political debates about animals in
captivity? At some point, in all the heated rhetoric, you have to wonder if it
is still about the animals.
No comments:
Post a Comment